Sorry, there's no other way to put it. He voted for Carpenter with his CY vote and then tries to lamely defend it in his column today. He admits that Carpenter's 17-4 record "jumped off the page to him". Wow, "win total", that's a great thing to get hung up on when grading a pitcher's season. Hey, Matt Palmer went 11-2 this year! I bet Schulman creamed his jeans when he saw that.
His feeble run support argument is a joke. It doesn't take into consideration individual games, which is how wins and losses are figured dipshit, he just looks and sees they got the same run support number. How many times did Tim leave with the lead or the game tied when the offense couldn't muster more than 1 or 2 runs for him? How many of those games did he not get the win? 8?
Forgetting the importance of the dominance factor when determining a Cy Young, he glosses over Lincecum's sick SO total and defends Carpenter's keen ground ball inducing skills. Even at the end of his article the best he's done is argue it's a toss up. If that the case you give it to the pitcher you WATCHED all year. He voted for a guy I bet he only saw pitch in person a couple of times. Idiot.....